Follow

"It is the duty of machines and those who design them to understand people. It is not our duty to understand the arbitrary, meaningless dictates of machines." On Weaponised Design: ourdataourselves.tacticaltech.

@info_activism what a stridently consumerist af message. we're at this impasse because, in my view, we have kept machines cryptic & esoteric, black boxes, processors. all machines are arbitrary, all interfaces are dictates.

the only way to begin to change the power balance, to create a healthy genuineness, is not by trying harder to presuppose we know our user, each and every one- an unhumble, solar-sized-ego gross supposition- but to alter the field of computing itself to begin to try to simmer away abstraction & to make computing more malleable.

make computing more naked, more able to be dived into. and include the tools & radically simify environments such that computing processes are more than run-only, so that they can be shaped & learned & experimented with and altered. so everyone can instill their own will & own accessibilities.

this task before us is not on programmers writing apps, working with empathy. it's on computing itself de-esotericizing, coming out of it's black boxes.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon.cc

Mastodon for Art